|
Maurits Escher 'Hand with Reflecting Sphere'
1935,
Lithograph
Cart Carriers in Tana
Coal Shop in Tana

|
Research
UCLA Language Materials Project
Research Assistant for the UCLA
Language Materials Project, a project funded by the United States Department
of Education. Entering language materials into a database, creating linguistic
profiles for less commonly taught languages, including Greek and writing
reports related to the availability of teaching materials for each language.
Research on Malagasy Language
Acquisition
(From the Linguistics Department
Newsletter)
In February 2004, Prof. Cecile
Manorohanta of the Universite Nord in Madagascar visited our department
for a month to pursue her research on language acquisition by Malagasy
children. She brought with her recordings and transcripts of sessions
with three different children over an eight month period. A team consisting
of Prof. Manorohanta, Profs. Ed Keenan and Nina Hyams, and two graduate
students, Dimitris Ntelitheos and Eleni Christodoulou was set up to code
the child data into a format for retrieval of information pertinent to
questions currently being asked about child language acquisition in general.
This work has so far resulted in three research papers, two presented at
international conferences.
The Malagasy data are especially
valuable since Malagasy differs in several crucial ways from the European
languages on which most studies of language acquisition have been based.
In particular Malagasy does not make a distinction between finite and non-finite
verb forms (Mary is eating versus Mary wants to eat). Further Malagasy,
like Philippine languages, has a very rich voice system (many different
kinds of "passive" verbs) and these forms are learned much earlier than
passives in English.
Field Work in Madagascar
In May 2005 I was awarded the Yvonne
and Harry Lenart Travel Fellowship which enabled me to travel to
Madagascar and collect data on Malagasy nominalizations and related issues.
Malagasy has a rich inventory of different types of nominalizations which
can provide insights into major theoretical problems in linguistic theory
including the relation between the morphological shape of words to their
syntactic properties, and the possibility of capturing the different distributional
properties of words with syntactic rules alone, without refuge to a special
morphological component of grammar. Some of the issues my research aims
to address in this respect are:
Why do different nominalizations
exhibit different properties both in their internal syntactic structure
(i.e. what elements they can contain) and their external distribution (i.e.
what positions the phrases can occupy)?
How does Malagasy implement morphological
means to express concepts that are expressed by independent words and phrases
in English?
How important is the process of
nominalization in Malagasy and Austronesian in general and how do nominalizations
in these languages differ from nominalizations in the better-studied Indo-European
languages?
Finally, what insights can the
morphosyntax of Malagasy nominalizations bring to analyses of constituent
structure in Malagasy and related languages?
Dissertation Research
In June 2005 I was awarded the
Dissertation Year Fellowship in order to pursue further my work on Malagasy
nominalizations and complete my dissertation. I am currently working on
the structure of the Malagasy nominal domain, the strong parallelism between
the nominal and clausal domains in the language, and how nominalizations
can inform us on the more general properties of Malagasy clausal architecture.
My work in this respect is based
on two basic assumptions about the syntactic structure of nominalizations.
Firstly, I assume that different properties of various nominalizations
are derived from variation in merger height of nominalizing affixes. Higher
attachment corresponds to the expression of more verbal properties (accusative
object, adverbial modification) while lower attachment corresponds
to the expression of more nominal properties (genitive subject, adjectival
modification and prepositional objects). A second assumption that I adopt
is that all nominalizations are syntactic in nature and that their syntactic
formation involves a structure that contains a determiner selecting a clausal
string. This configuration has recently been assumed to represent the underlying
structure of relative clauses (Kayne, 1994), and even common noun phrases
(Koopman 2003). Data from Malagasy and other Austronesian languages provide
evidence that this particular configuration can also be assumed to underlie
nominalizations.
|